What to Know About the Congressional Push for Expanded Social Security Benefits?

Efforts to expand Social Security benefits have gained significant momentum in the U.S. Congress. A bill recently passed in the House of Representatives plans to do away with two contentious provisions that place some limitations on Social Security payouts for millions of Americans. While this legislative step brings hope to many, much remains uncertain about its fate in the Senate. Here is a closer look at what the bill entails, the potential impact, and what comes next.

What Does the Social Security Bill Propose?

This legislation, years in the making, targets the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO)two federal policies that have long reduced Social Security payouts for certain groups of people.

The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)

The WEP reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who also receive pensions from jobs that did not participate in the Social Security system. For example, public-sector employees such as state and local government workers are often impacted. 

The Government Pension Offset (GPO)

The GPO, however, impacts surviving spouses who receive individual government pensions. This provision greatly diminishes spousal or survivor benefits under Social Security, thus financially compromising many widows and widowers.

Together, these two provisions restrict payments for around 2.8 million Americans, concludes the Congressional Research Service. The more affected groups include:

• Teachers
• Firefighters
• Police officers
• State, local, and federal government employees

The proposed legislation would completely eliminate both the WEP and the GPO, thus bringing benefits increases for those affected.

Why Is This Legislation Important?

The repeal of the provisions has long been sought after by advocates and lawmakers, who argue that the policies are inherently unfair. They argue that the affected individuals paid into Social Security and that they should receive full benefits, just like other workers.

Supporters of the bill argue that the WEP and GPO unduly harm public servants. For instance, a retired teacher who worked another job, with all her Social Security taxes paid in, could find her retirement benefit reduced below even an inflation adjustment. Similarly, GPO can make surviving spouses vulnerable to financial crises, even though they may have contributed to Social Security for decades.

Proponents say that the provisions amount to "theft"-stealing the earned benefits from individuals. Rep. Garret Graves (R-La.) and Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), co-sponsors of the bill, pointed out,

"For over 40 years, the Social Security trust funds have been artificially propped up by benefits that millions of Americans paid for-and that their families deserve. The time to put an end to this theft is now."

How Much Would This Expansion Cost?

Although the repeal of WEP and GPO would bring relief to millions, the financial relief comes at a high fiscal cost. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that over the next 10 years, the legislation will add an estimated $195 billion in federal deficits.

Implications for the Social Security Trust Funds

Increased spending could worsen the financial burden for the Social Security Trust Funds. Projections currently suggest that if no changes are made, the funds will not have sufficient to pay out full benefits after 2035. Opponents of the added spending say it only accelerates the insolvency of the program.

Balancing Costs with Fairness

Despite these concerns, supporters argue that fairness should take precedence. They argue that the funds wrongly withheld from retirees under WEP and GPO were wrongly used to prop up Social Security's finances. Repealing these provisions would correct the wrong rather than add new fiscal challenges for Congress.

What's Next?

The bill now moves to the Senate after it passed in the House in a bipartisan vote 327-75. Although the measure is highly supported, it might not pass.

Senate Support and Obstacles

The bill has 63 co-sponsors in the Senate. It is more than the 60 votes necessary to defeat a filibuster. Senators Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) who are the lead sponsors of the bill have been actively pushing the colleagues to prioritize the legislation.

The Senate, however, is scheduled to deal with a heavy agenda in the remaining weeks of the legislative session. Government funding, disaster relief, and the annual defense authorization bill are among topics that will likely consume floor time. These competing priorities may delay consideration of the Social Security bill.

Timeline for Action

In that event, it would proceed to President Joe Biden for signature. The provisions of the legislation would apply to benefits payable after December 2023. If the bill is not passed, though, before the start of the new congressional session on January 3, 2024, it will pass out of existence, and supporters will have to start over from square one.

Broader Implications for Social Security

Repeal of WEP and GPO urges expansion of benefits is part of a larger debate about the future of Social Security. The solution today is fix specific inequities; however, the future of the program is in greater peril:

The Financial Outlook for Social Security

The trust funds for Social Security are projected to be depleted by 2035, after which the benefits would have to be cut unless new revenue sources or reforms are adopted. Increasing benefit amounts without addressing the program's long-term funding issues can worsen its fiscal outlook.

Calls for Comprehensive Reform

Some lawmakers and advocates are advocating for more comprehensive reform to ensure sustainability of the program. Proposals include raising payroll taxes, increasing the retirement age or introducing means-testing of benefit benefits. Any reforms will be controversial, representing political fault lines in aligning equity, adequacy, and fiscal prudence.

Public Reaction and Advocacy

As has been seen, such plans of repealing WEP and GPO have been receiving wide acclaim among public workers, unions, and advocacy groups. They are arguing that the policies only punish the individuals who spent their whole professional lifetimes serving the public sector.

Grassroots campaigns and lobbying efforts have brought this issue to the fore. They tell the political elements that revoking these provisions has not only financial implications but also honors the contributions made by the affected members.

Conclusion

The push for expanded Social Security benefits by repealing the WEP and GPO through the Congress is a long step toward resolving these long-standing inequities. Although the bill now has a big hurdle passed in the House, its fate in the Senate remains precarious because of other legislative priorities and fear of the fiscal impact it might hold.

To the millions of Americans who are affected by these provisions, the stakes are high. The legislation would be a lifeline of financial relief to public-sector workers and surviving spouses who consider it an unfair punishment--one that this legislation corrects. More fundamentally, however, challenges confronting Social Security underscore the need for more comprehensive reforms to ensure the program's sustainability for future generations.

The coming weeks will seal whether this change that is long overdue becomes a reality or an unfulfilled promise.

Click here to get a Work From Home Option to create another source of income.